The favored attack of SJWs is the ad hominem. It’s an easy way for them to feel safe and secure in the false characterization of their intended victim, and it’s a big trap for the unsuspecting recipient. For the inexperienced layman coming across this situation, one’s normal reaction is to go on the defensive and attempt to explain why you are not whatever they are accusing you of being. This plays right into their hands as they then embark on continuing rounds of illogical argument designed to drive their victim to despair. A common tactic is to get the victim to apologise – apologising isn’t so hard, is it? This again is a big trap, much like when they ask for concessions – give them an inch and they’ll take a mile. And they are never ever satisfied. They will keep going until you are destroyed.

So for the unitiated I have prepared a sample list of common ah hom attacks that SJWs use in these situations. This list is not comprehensive, (it is rather difficult to keep up with the bewildering number of terms which they continue to invent as it suits them), so I encourage my faithful readers to add their own to this list. Perhaps some SJWs can chime in, in case I’ve missed any that they know about! Ahahahahahahaha. But seriously folks …

Racist – a white person who disagrees with a non-white SJW on any matter.

Misogynist – a man who disagrees with an SJW female on any matter.

Homophobe – a man who disagrees with a homosexual SJW on any matter. For some reason females are exempt from this tag.

Fascist – Term used by an ‘intellectual’ SJW in place of Racist.

Bigot – Back-up insult used together with one of the other terms to add weight to the abuse.

Vandal – Someone who disagrees with an SJW over anything to do with the environment.

Denier – Anyone who refuses to follow the Great Global Warming scam.

Gamer – a new insult signifying a person who does not agree that games should be a platform for SJW activism.

Sexist – Back-up insult used with one of the other terms to add weight to the abuse.

Rapist – a man who does not adhere to a strict, vague and ever-changing performance and behaviour criteria during any form of physical contact with a female.

Traitor – any female or non-white person who disagrees with an SJW on any matter.

Not a real ‘…’ – someone of a protected sub-group who disagrees with an SJW on any matter. For example, “He is not a real homosexual.”

Victimizer – anyone who opposes any SJW on any matter.

Intolerant Oppressor – a person who objects to another culture’s practice no matter its shape, form or intent.

Nazi – a person who publically wins an argument against an SJW.

Tea-bagger – a woman or gay man who is penetrated by a non-SJW man.

Sock-Puppet – a lower caste version of a victimizer. Victimizers are a legitimate threat to SJWs, whereas sock-puppets are akin to bees in a bee hive. Trust me, it makes sense to them.

Vox Day has a post up concerning what is supposed to be a leaked internal post from Gawker Media’s Nick Denton. Here is the interesting bit:

“… It was there all along and oh so very simple. infiltrate the group and kill
them from the inside. The media parade that has been going on for weeks
now hasn’t done anything worth a damn. Time and effort thrown out the
window with needless articles over this shit show. None of it has made a damn bit of difference until now. Everyone is eager to throw themselves at mainstream outlets. but none of them are eager to spend the money they are already using to fix this problem the right way. So I had someone send out feelers looking for people to work on a “special project” for me. Those that made it through screening have been taking part in an effort to police the group from the inside, causing a wedge to be driven amongst them. Today serves as evidence of money well spent. they have begun to crack and their influential people are beginning to part ways with the group.

Eventually there will be such a small minority that it will just blow over and nobody will care …”

My bullshit antenna went up very quickly on reading this. If gamergate was really such a problem and you had gone to such lengths to infiltrate its activities, why would you be sending out this sort of rubbish even internally? This seems to me to be an attempt to salvage something from their own failed infiltration attempt. In other words, their initial plan didn’t work so maybe they can stir up the gamergaters by “leaking” this one out to the general mainstream. Once again, and I’ve said it before, the anti-gamergate crowd is in serious trouble because their usual tactics are not working and they are not astute enough to put themselves in the heads of their opponents in order to figure out what to do. They think everyone sees the world the same way that they do and they react accordingly.

There is another possibility as well. That they really did do an infiltration attempt and that this memo was indeed leaked from inside Gawker. Which behooves me to ask, who has exactly done the infiltrating here? You’re boasting internally that you’ve gone and infiltrated your enemy and someone on the inside of your organisation leaked that out? That’s kind of embarrassing and ironic all rolled up into one fun-bag of shame if you ask me. Either way the panic continues.